Comparing Assessments

Understanding personal values is crucial for self-awareness, decision-making, and aligning one’s actions with their core principles. Two popular tools used for assessing personal values are the Resilience Innovator® Type Assessment (RITA) and the Hartman Value Profile (HVP). In this article, we will compare and contrast these two assessments, exploring their similarities and differences, and their potential applications in personal and professional contexts.

What is the Hartman Value Profile?

The Hartman Value Profile is an assessment tool developed by Robert S. Hartman that measures an individual’s values based on three dimensions: Intrinsic, Extrinsic, and Systemic. This assessment identifies an individual’s core values, beliefs, and motivations, providing insights into what they consider important and meaningful in their lives.

How Can I Use the Hartman Value Profile?

The Hartman Value Profile can be applied in various personal and professional contexts, such as career development, organizational culture, and personal growth. It helps individuals understand their deepest values and priorities, make decisions aligned with their core principles, and enhance personal fulfillment. In organizational settings, it can support creating a values-driven culture, improving team dynamics, and aligning individual and organizational goals.

What is RITA?

The Resilience Innovator® Type Assessment (RITA) is a personality assessment tool. It identifies an individual’s Resilience Innovator® archetype, of which there are ten. These archetypes represent different approaches to resilience, problem-solving, and innovation, with each type having its unique strengths and preferences.

How Can I Use RITA?

RITA is specifically designed to assess an individual’s resilience level and innovation style and can be used in various contexts, such as innovation and entrepreneurship training, organizational development, and leadership development. It can help individuals understand their reactions to stressful environments, their natural innovation tendencies, their strengths in the innovation process, and their areas for growth. It can also facilitate effective teamwork and collaboration by bringing together individuals with complementary innovation styles.

How are RITA and the Hartman Value Profile similar?

A common goal of both assessments is developing an individual’s understanding of themselves and their teammates. While each assessment approaches this goal differently, both assessments provide teams with a common language to understand individuals.

How are RITA and the Hartman Value Profile different?

There are several differences between both assessments, which are broken down below:

1. Focus: While the Hartman Value Profile focuses on identifying an individual’s core values and beliefs, the Resilience Innovator® Type Assessment focuses on an individual’s strengths and weaknesses specifically under pressure.
2. Number of Dimensions: The Resilience Innovator® Type Assessment has ten archetypes concerned with an individual’s resilience and innovation potential, while the Hartman Value Profile has three dimensions that measure an individual’s values.
3. Depth of Assessment: The Resilience Innovator® Type Assessment provides a comprehensive understanding of an individual’s levels of resilience and innovation potential, with detailed descriptions of each archetype’s characteristics, strengths, and weaknesses, helping individuals understand their abilities in pressure-filled situations. The Hartman Value Profile provides a deep exploration of an individual’s core values, beliefs, and motivations, helping individuals align their actions with their values and live a more purposeful life.

In conclusion, the Resilience Innovator® Type Assessment and the Hartman Value Profile are valuable assessment tools that provide insights into an individual’s preferences, values, and beliefs. They have different focuses, dimensions, contexts, and depths of assessment, making them suitable for different personal and professional applications. Individuals and organizations can choose the assessment tool that best aligns with their specific needs and goals for personal growth, decision-making, and creating a values-driven environment.