Comparing Assessments

Personality assessment tools are valuable resources that can provide individuals and organizations with insights into their strengths, preferences, and natural tendencies, which can help develop stronger teams and more sustainable organizations. Two popular personality assessment tools are the Resilience Innovator® Type Assessment and the CliftonStrengths® Assessment (formerly StrengthsFinders®). In this article, we will compare and contrast these two assessments, exploring their similarities and differences, as well as their applications in personal and professional contexts.

What is CliftonStrengths®?

The CliftonStrengths® Assessment is a personality assessment tool developed by Gallup that identifies an individual’s unique set of talents and strengths based on 34 themes. These themes represent different areas of natural talent, such as strategic thinking, relationship building, and execution, and are grouped into four domains: Strategic Thinking, Relationship Building, Influencing, and Executing.

How Can I Use CliftonStrengths®?

The CliftonStrengths® Assessment can be used in a wide range of personal and professional contexts, such as personal development, leadership development, team building, and career counseling. It can help individuals discover their natural talents and strengths, develop strategies to leverage them for personal and professional growth, and improve communication and relationships with others. It can also help organizations build stronger teams and improve employee engagement and productivity by leveraging each individual’s unique strengths.

What is RITA?

The Resilience Innovator® Type Assessment (RITA) is a personality assessment tool. It identifies an individual’s Resilience Innovator® archetype, of which there are ten. These archetypes represent different approaches to resilience, problem-solving, and innovation, with each type having its unique strengths and preferences.

How Can I Use RITA?

RITA is specifically designed to assess an individual’s resilience level and innovation style and can be used in various contexts, such as innovation and entrepreneurship training, organizational development, and leadership development. It can help individuals understand their reactions to stressful environments, their natural innovation tendencies, their strengths in the innovation process, and their areas for growth. It can also facilitate effective teamwork and collaboration by bringing together individuals with complementary innovation styles.

How are RITA & CliftonStrengths® similar?

As outputs go, the CliftonStrengths® Assessment and the Resilience Innovator® Type Assessment both provide a ranked list of traits, though the traits are different. Nonetheless, this style of output provides structure to individuals by putting strengths in context with other traits.

How are RITA & CliftonStrengths® different?

There are several differences between both assessments, which can be broken down below.

1. Focus: While the CliftonStrengths® Assessment focuses on an individual’s unique set of talents and strengths, the Resilience Innovator® Type Assessment focuses on an individual’s strengths and weaknesses specifically under pressure.
2. Number of Types: The Resilience Innovator® Type Assessment has 50 Key Traits related to resilience & innovation grouped into five dichotomies, while the CliftonStrengths® Assessment has 34 themes grouped into four domains.
3. Depth of Assessment: The Resilience Innovator® Type Assessment provides a comprehensive assessment of an individual’s levels of resilience and innovation potential, with detailed descriptions of each archetype’s characteristics, strengths, and weaknesses. The CliftonStrengths® Assessment provides a detailed assessment of an individual’s talents and strengths, including practical tips for leveraging them for personal and professional growth.

In conclusion, the Resilience Innovator® Type Assessment and the CliftonStrengths® Assessment are two valuable personality assessment tools that offer unique perspectives on an individual’s natural tendencies and strengths. They have different focuses, contexts, and depths of assessment, making them suitable for different personal and professional contexts. Individuals and organizations can choose the assessment tool that best aligns with their specific needs and goals for personal or professional development.