Comparing Assessments

Understanding individual behaviors and work styles is essential for building effective teams, optimizing talent acquisition, and fostering organizational success. Two widely recognized assessment tools used for uncovering behavioral insights are the Resilience Innovator® Type Assessment and the Predictive Index Assessment. In this article, we will compare and contrast these two assessments, exploring their similarities and differences, as well as their applications in various organizational contexts.

What is the Predictive Index Assessment?

The Predictive Index Assessment is a comprehensive behavioral assessment tool that measures an individual’s workplace behaviors and drives. It evaluates factors such as dominance, extraversion, patience, and formality to provide insights into an individual’s work style, communication preferences, and motivations.

How Can I Use the Predictive Index Assessment?

The Predictive Index Assessment finds applications in talent acquisition, team development, and performance management. It helps organizations identify behavioral patterns, make informed hiring decisions, build high-performing teams, and optimize employee engagement by aligning roles with individuals’ behavioral strengths.

What is RITA?

The Resilience Innovator® Type Assessment (RITA) is a personality assessment tool. It identifies an individual’s Resilience Innovator® archetype, of which there are ten. These archetypes represent different approaches to resilience, problem-solving, and innovation, with each type having its unique strengths and preferences.

How Can I Use RITA?

RITA is specifically designed to assess an individual’s resilience level and innovation style and can be used in various contexts, such as innovation and entrepreneurship training, organizational development, and leadership development. It can help individuals understand their reactions to stressful environments, their natural innovation tendencies, their strengths in the innovation process, and their areas for growth. It can also facilitate effective teamwork and collaboration by bringing together individuals with complementary innovation styles.

What are the similarities between RITA and the Predictive Index?

RITA and the Predictive Index assessment can both be used for team development and talent acquisition. Additionally, they both measure behavioral factors in order to determine an individual’s motivations and tendencies in the workplace.

What are the differences between RITA and the Predictive Index?

1. Focus: While the Predictive Index Assessment concentrates on evaluating workplace behaviors and drives, the Resilience Innovator® Type Assessment focuses on an individual’s strengths and weaknesses specifically under pressure.
2. Behavioral Dimensions: The Resilience Innovator® Type Assessment assesses three behavioral conditions–sociability, grit, and attitude–to determine behavioral dimensions, whereas the Predictive Index Assessment evaluates multiple behavioral dimensions such as dominance, extraversion, patience, and formality. Additionally, RITA includes a personality assessment that measures tendencies and preferences.
3. Depth of Assessment: The Predictive Index Assessment provides a detailed understanding of an individual’s behavioral tendencies, communication preferences, and motivations. The Resilience Innovator® Type Assessment provides a comprehensive assessment of an individual’s levels of resilience and innovation potential, with detailed descriptions of each archetype’s characteristics, strengths, and weaknesses.

In conclusion, both the Resilience Innovator® Type Assessment and the Predictive Index Assessment offer valuable insights into individual behaviors and work styles. While the Resilience Innovator Type Assessment focuses on innovation styles and problem-solving approaches, the Predictive Index Assessment delves into a broader range of workplace behaviors and drives. The choice between the two assessments depends on the specific objectives and contexts in which they will be utilized. Whether one seeks to enhance innovation capabilities or make informed talent management decisions, both assessments contribute to unlocking behavioral insights, optimizing team dynamics, and driving organizational success.